Speak To Attorney Now
(707) 422-1202
SPEAK TO ATTORNEY NOW(707) 422-1202
Speak To Attorney Now
(707) 422-1202 SPEAK TO ATTORNEY NOW(707) 422-1202
California lane splitting laws often become the first argument after a motorcycle collision, especially when an insurer looks for an easy way to shift blame. We see it in Sacramento when a driver says they “never saw the rider,” then claims lane splitting caused everything. Confusion grows fast because traffic was tight, speeds change quickly, and witnesses may only catch a split second. Even when lane splitting is legal, the details still matter because fault depends on what was reasonable in that moment. That is why we focus on the facts that prove how the crash happened, not assumptions about motorcycles. When injuries and bills pile up, clear answers and fast action protect your health and your claim. If you need a Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyer, we are ready to listen and step in.
Insurance companies often treat lane splitting like a shortcut to reduce payouts, even when the driver made the critical mistake. Adjusters may suggest the rider was “automatically at fault,” but California cases turn on evidence and shared responsibility rules. Small details can change everything, such as a sudden lane change, a late signal, or a driver drifting while distracted. The rider’s speed and spacing matter too, yet they must be proven with real facts, not guesses. Because evidence disappears quickly, we move early to preserve video, locate witnesses, and document vehicle positions. Our team brings courtroom-ready preparation and straight talk, backed by the values you can learn more about on our firm page. If you want to talk through what happened, you can reach us anytime through our contact page.
Lane splitting is legal in California, but legality does not end the discussion after a collision. Fault still depends on how the crash occurred and whether each person acted reasonably. California Vehicle Code 21658.1 defines lane splitting and allows the California Highway Patrol to publish safety guidance. Those CHP lane splitting guidelines help explain safer practices, yet they do not create automatic fault rules. Drivers still must watch for motorcycles, signal, and change lanes safely because a rider can be present between lanes. Riders still must use safe judgment, avoid reckless moves, and protect their visibility.
When a motorcycle lane splitting accident happens, insurance companies often look for a quick story that reduces what they pay. We push back by building a clean timeline, gathering proof, and correcting inaccurate assumptions. That work matters in Sacramento because congested commutes can make drivers impatient and riders harder to see. If the crash involved a car making a sudden lane change, it can overlap with the same liability issues we handle in cases involving help after a Sacramento crash. For broader local resources and next-step guidance, you can also find Sacramento injury claim help that applies to many collision situations. If pain, missed work, or mounting bills are already in the picture, it is smart to act early. We are ready to step in, protect your claim, and handle the insurance pressure before it gets worse.
California lane splitting laws use a simple concept: a motorcycle can travel between lanes of cars that are stopped or moving. Most riders think of it as easing through congestion, while many drivers describe it as “a bike coming up between lanes.” Both descriptions can be true, yet the exact details still matter after a collision. Speeds, spacing, traffic flow, and visibility can change quickly in Sacramento, especially on busy commutes and freeway backups. Because of that, the same general behavior can look safe in one situation and risky in another. When we evaluate a lane splitting claim, we focus on what a careful rider and a careful driver would do in those specific conditions. That careful, fact-based approach helps prevent unfair blame and supports a stronger demand for compensation.
People often mix up lane splitting with other terms, and that confusion can affect what ends up in a police report or insurance notes. Lane splitting usually refers to riding between lanes when traffic is moving or stopped. Some people say “lane filtering” when they mean moving between lanes at very low speeds, such as approaching a red light. Others use “lane sharing” as a general phrase for motorcycles riding near cars. After a crash, however, insurance adjusters may treat these words like admissions and use them to frame fault. We encourage clear, simple descriptions of what happened, including where each vehicle was, what lane changes occurred, and when signals were used. That clarity protects you because it keeps the discussion grounded in facts. If the terminology gets twisted, we correct it early so the claim does not drift in the wrong direction.
A single line in a report can steer a claim because insurers rely on summaries, not nuance. If a report says “motorcycle was lane splitting,” an adjuster may jump to speed assumptions without proof. Drivers may also describe a rider as “flying” or “weaving” even when traffic was crawling and the bike was moving steadily. That is why documentation matters, including photos, video, and witness contact details. When we handle rider crash claim help, we look for objective proof that shows speed, lane position, and the driver’s actions leading up to impact. We also review the report for errors and missing context, then submit corrections when appropriate. For support with a lane splitting California law dispute, start with our rider crash claim help page and reach out as soon as you can.
California Vehicle Code 21658.1 is the core statute people point to when asking about California lane splitting laws. It defines lane splitting as riding a motorcycle between rows of stopped or moving vehicles on a divided or undivided street, road, or highway. The law also authorizes the California Highway Patrol to develop educational guidance that promotes safety and awareness. That matters because many riders and drivers assume there is a detailed rulebook in the statute itself. Instead, the statute sets the definition and supports safety education. Because of that structure, a crash case rarely turns on one sentence of the code alone. What usually decides the outcome is the full set of facts, including driver decisions, traffic conditions, and the reasonableness of the rider’s actions.
A common misunderstanding is that California lane splitting laws set a specific speed limit for lane splitting. The statute does not list a single “legal speed” or a strict number that automatically makes lane splitting unlawful. It also does not say that a rider is automatically at fault just because a motorcycle was between lanes. Insurance companies still try to treat lane splitting as a blame magnet because it feels unfamiliar to some drivers. However, fault decisions depend on evidence, timing, and whether each person used reasonable care. If a driver changed lanes without signaling or checking blind spots, that conduct still matters even when a motorcycle was lane splitting. When we step in as a Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyer team, we keep the conversation focused on provable actions rather than assumptions.
CHP lane splitting guidelines are best understood as safety recommendations that help riders and drivers reduce risk. They often discuss ideas like speed difference, traffic flow, and the importance of staying predictable. In a claim, insurers may cherry-pick those ideas to argue a rider acted “unreasonably,” even when the driver created the danger. That is why context matters, including how fast traffic was moving, how much space existed, and whether the driver’s lane change was safe. We use available evidence to show what happened in the seconds leading up to impact, not what someone thinks “should” have happened. When the facts support the rider, those facts can overcome biased narratives about lane splitting. If the collision happened in Sacramento County, our team can also connect you with practical next steps through Sacramento injury claim help while we build the case the right way.
Lane splitting California law allows riders to travel between lanes, yet safety still depends on judgment. CHP lane splitting guidelines exist because real-world traffic creates fast-changing risks. A small gap can close without warning when a driver changes lanes, brakes hard, or drifts while distracted. Riders also face hazards that cars may not notice, such as pavement seams, debris, and uneven lane markings. Because of these risks, safety guidance helps riders choose safer moments and helps drivers anticipate motorcycles. Following lane splitting safety tips can also strengthen credibility after a crash because it shows care and predictability. We use that kind of real-world context to counter arguments that paint every lane split as reckless.
Safe lane splitting depends on the relationship between the motorcycle’s speed and surrounding traffic. When traffic crawls, a modest speed difference can reduce risk because it gives drivers more time to notice and react. In contrast, large speed differences can shrink reaction time and make a sudden lane change more dangerous. Riders also need to watch traffic patterns because some lanes stop faster than others near on-ramps and exits. Drivers often change lanes late in these areas, which is why visibility and signaling matter. We pay close attention to these patterns when a motorcycle lane splitting accident occurs because they can explain why a driver’s move was unsafe. Evidence such as video, witness accounts, and damage angles often reveals what traffic was doing at the moment of impact.
Where a rider places the bike between lanes can affect how visible the rider is to nearby drivers. Blind spots are a common cause of lane splitting collisions because drivers may glance quickly and assume the lane is clear. Predictable positioning, steady movement, and avoiding weaving can help reduce that risk. Riders also benefit from watching front wheels and vehicle spacing because they often signal a lane change before a turn signal appears. Drivers can help by checking mirrors twice, signaling early, and leaving enough space to change lanes safely. These habits protect everyone because they reduce surprise moves in tight traffic. When we investigate a case, we look for the visibility factors that explain why a driver should have noticed a rider and waited.
Weather and road surfaces can turn a normal commute into a high-risk environment. Rain, glare, and reduced traction can affect braking distance for both motorcycles and cars. Oil spots, gravel, or uneven pavement can destabilize a bike, especially near lane lines where debris collects. Night riding adds another layer because drivers may misjudge speed and distance when only a headlight is visible. Because of these factors, what is reasonable at noon on dry pavement may not be reasonable in a storm or at dusk. Insurers sometimes ignore road conditions when they argue a rider “should not have been there.” We do not, because those conditions often explain why a driver needed to slow down, signal earlier, and stay in their lane.
Even when a motorcycle is riding between lanes, drivers must still operate with reasonable care. Safe lane changes require signaling, checking mirrors, and confirming blind spots are clear. Many lane splitting crashes happen because a driver moves over quickly in stop-and-go traffic, assuming there is no one beside them. That assumption is dangerous because motorcycles can approach faster than expected and can be hidden by pillars or larger vehicles. We often find that the critical moment is not the rider’s position, but the driver’s decision to merge without enough time or space. When that happens, the law does not excuse the driver simply because a rider was lane splitting. The facts, the timing, and the driver’s actions still matter for fault and motorcycle accident compensation California claims.
Some drivers react to lane splitting by tightening their position or trying to stop a rider from passing. That kind of blocking can increase the risk of a collision because it forces a rider into a smaller space with fewer options. It can also look like intentional or careless conduct when witnesses describe what happened. Frustration in traffic is understandable, yet safety requires predictable driving, not sudden moves. A driver who drifts toward the lane line, accelerates to close a gap, or changes lanes without signaling can trigger a crash in seconds. When we review these cases, we look for proof of the driver’s behavior, including witness statements and video when available. If you need help sorting out fault after a collision, start with our Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyer team so we can protect the evidence early.
Lane splitting is often discussed on freeways, but surface streets create hazards too. In slower traffic, a driver or passenger may open a door without checking mirrors, which can cause a sudden and severe impact. Parking zones, rideshare drop-offs, and busy corridors increase this risk because doors open frequently and unexpectedly. Drivers can reduce danger by checking mirrors before opening doors and by choosing safer pull-over locations when possible. Riders can reduce risk by scanning for brake lights, turn signals, and parked vehicles with occupants inside. When a crash happens, these details can help explain why the driver had the last clear chance to prevent it. If the collision involved a vehicle maneuver similar to other traffic cases, we also handle claims where people need help after a Sacramento crash.
One of the most common causes of a motorcycle lane splitting accident is a driver moving into a lane without checking for a bike between lanes. Congestion makes this worse because drivers change lanes to chase small openings and may signal late or not at all. A rider can be visible one second and hidden the next behind a pillar or mirror angle. When a vehicle crosses the lane line, even slightly, the rider may have no safe escape path. These crashes often produce conflicting stories because both people feel surprised. Evidence usually resolves that conflict because damage angles and vehicle positions can show who moved into whom. We use that proof to push back when insurers try to turn lane splitting into a blanket excuse.
Traffic can stop quickly near freeway interchanges, and drivers often brake hard when they realize they are about to miss an exit. That sudden braking can trigger rapid lane changes as cars try to avoid rear-end impacts. Riders lane splitting through these areas may face multiple vehicles moving unpredictably at the same time. Insurers sometimes blame the rider for being present, yet the real hazard is the driver’s abrupt decision-making under pressure. In these cases, the timeline matters because the crash may be caused by a late merge, an un-signaled swerve, or a vehicle cutting across multiple lanes. Video, witness accounts, and the location of debris often clarify the chain of events. When we see this pattern, we focus on how the driver’s choices created the danger in the first place.
A brief distraction is enough for a driver to drift toward the lane divider. Phones, navigation screens, and even quick glances at passengers can pull attention away at the wrong moment. For a rider traveling between lanes, that drift can collapse the available space without warning. Many drivers later say they “never saw the motorcycle,” which is common in distraction-related crashes. That statement does not end the analysis because the duty is to look before moving. When distraction is suspected, we look for supporting proof such as witness reports, camera footage, and the driver’s own words at the scene. This is one reason we encourage quick action, because important evidence can disappear or be overwritten.
City streets add different hazards because lanes are narrower and parking activity is constant. A rider passing between lanes near slower traffic can encounter a car pulling into a parking spot, a rideshare stopping abruptly, or a door opening into the rider’s path. These crashes are often preventable because drivers and passengers have time to check mirrors before acting. After a collision, insurers may still try to shift blame onto the rider by focusing only on the bike’s position. We look at the bigger picture, including where the vehicle stopped, whether signals were used, and whether anyone checked before opening a door. Those details can support fault findings that lead to fair motorcycle accident compensation California claims. If you need help after a collision in Sacramento County, our team provides straightforward Sacramento injury claim help and can step in quickly.
Comparative fault California motorcycle accident rules allow responsibility to be shared between more than one person. That means a rider can still recover compensation even if an insurer argues the rider contributed in some way. In practice, insurance companies use comparative fault to reduce payouts, so they often look for any detail they can frame as careless. Lane splitting becomes a target because it is easy to describe in a way that sounds risky without proving the real cause. The important question is whether each person acted reasonably under the conditions, including traffic speed, visibility, and lane-change behavior. We build cases with the goal of keeping fault analysis grounded in evidence, not opinion. When we do that work early, it becomes harder for insurers to exaggerate shared blame.
Adjusters often start with broad statements like “lane splitting is dangerous,” then move toward assumptions about speed and reaction time. They may claim a rider was going too fast without any reliable measurement, or they may take a general safety tip and treat it like a strict rule. Another common tactic is to ignore the driver’s lane-change duty and focus only on the rider’s position. These arguments can feel convincing when you are in pain and trying to keep up with calls and paperwork. However, they are not the final word because the claim must be supported by facts. We respond by organizing proof that shows the driver’s actions, the rider’s predictability, and the conditions at the moment of impact. That evidence-led approach protects the value of a case and helps prevent unfair reductions.
What you do in the first hours and days can shape the fault narrative that follows. If you can, document the scene and gather witness contact information before people leave. Seek medical care promptly because treatment records connect the crash to your injuries and show the seriousness of your condition. When you speak with insurance, keep statements factual and avoid guessing about speed or distance. It is also wise to avoid recorded statements until you have advice, because insurance questions are designed to lock in sound bites. Preserve your helmet, gear, and the motorcycle in its post-crash condition because they can help prove how impact occurred. If you want a team to handle the pressure and protect your claim from the start, contact our rider crash claim help team and we will take it from there.
Motorcycle accident compensation California claims often start with measurable costs that show up on bills, pay stubs, and repair estimates. Medical care can add up quickly, especially when emergency treatment leads to follow-up appointments, imaging, medication, and physical therapy. Lost income matters too because even a short time off work can create overdue rent, missed car payments, and stress at home. Some people also face reduced earning capacity when injuries limit the type of work they can do long term. Property damage is another part of the picture because motorcycles, helmets, and protective gear can be expensive to replace. We document every category carefully so the claim reflects the full impact of the crash. When insurers rush a quick settlement, these losses are often the first things they try to minimize.
A lane splitting crash can affect far more than finances because pain and limitations follow you home. Daily tasks can become harder, sleep can suffer, and normal routines may feel out of reach for weeks or months. Emotional stress often shows up when you are dealing with injuries, uncertainty, and constant insurance contact. These impacts matter, yet insurance companies often treat them like afterthoughts because they are not tied to a receipt. We take the time to understand the full story so the claim reflects what you actually live with, not just what appears on paper. Clear medical documentation and consistent reporting of symptoms can support these damages without exaggeration. When we represent injured riders, we pursue a fair outcome that accounts for both the visible costs and the personal toll.
Some collisions lead to devastating outcomes for families, and those cases require both compassion and careful legal work. A wrongful death claim can address financial losses and the lasting impact of losing a loved one’s support and presence. These matters are also time-sensitive because evidence and records still need to be preserved, even while a family is grieving. We handle these cases with respect, clear communication, and a steady plan from the beginning. If your family is facing this kind of loss, we encourage you to reach out through our contact page so we can talk privately about next steps. Our Sacramento office supports families across the region with trusted Sacramento injury claim help and a focus on protecting what matters most.
After a collision, the first priority is safety and medical care because injuries are not always obvious right away. Adrenaline can mask pain, and symptoms like concussion signs or soft tissue injuries may appear hours later. If you can, move to a safer area, call 911, and accept evaluation from paramedics when offered. Follow up with a doctor the same day when possible, even if you think you can “shake it off.” Consistent treatment creates a clear record that connects the crash to your condition, which matters when insurance companies argue you were not really hurt. Keep copies of discharge papers, prescriptions, and appointment summaries so nothing gets lost. We use these records to support a strong demand for motorcycle accident compensation California claims.
If your condition allows, gather information quickly because the scene changes fast once vehicles move and traffic clears. Take wide photos that show lane markings, traffic signs, and the positions of vehicles, then take close-ups of damage and debris. Capture any skid marks, scrapes near lane lines, and the general traffic conditions because they can help explain why a lane change was unsafe. Ask witnesses for names and phone numbers since neutral observers often make the biggest difference in disputed lane splitting cases. If there is a nearby business, note its location because video may exist, but it may be overwritten within days. Keep your helmet, jacket, gloves, and other gear in the same condition after the crash because damage patterns can support how impact occurred. When we step in early as a Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyer, securing this evidence becomes a priority.
Insurance calls can start within hours, and the questions often sound friendly while aiming to lock in admissions. Stick to basic facts, such as where the crash occurred, the vehicles involved, and that you are seeking medical care. Avoid guessing about speed, distance, or what the other driver “must have seen,” because guesses can be used against you later. Do not agree that lane splitting caused the crash just because an adjuster suggests it, since fault depends on evidence and comparative fault rules. If the other driver’s insurer requests a recorded statement, it is reasonable to decline until you have legal guidance. Save all claim numbers, adjuster names, and email threads in one place so the record stays clean. If you need support managing these conversations, our team provides practical Sacramento injury claim help and can take over communications.
Some situations call for immediate legal help because delays make claims harder. If you have serious injuries, ongoing treatment, or missed work, early support can protect the documentation needed for full compensation. Disputed fault is another reason, especially when the other driver claims lane splitting was reckless or “illegal.” Cases involving commercial vehicles, rideshare drivers, or multiple cars can also become complex fast. Lowball offers and repeated adjuster calls are signs that the insurer wants a quick, cheap resolution. We step in to preserve evidence, manage communication, and build the case with trial-ready standards. If you are ready to talk, reach us through our contact page and we will take the next steps with you.
Lane splitting cases often come down to seconds, and those seconds can be captured on video or lost forever. Traffic cameras, business cameras, and dashcams may overwrite footage quickly, so waiting can weaken the claim. We send preservation requests, identify potential video sources, and move fast to secure what exists. Witness memories also fade, which is why early interviews can prevent story changes later. We review damage patterns, lane markings, and scene photos to confirm lane position and the direction of movement at impact. That evidence can counter vague claims like “the motorcycle came out of nowhere.” When you hire our Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyer team, the goal is to lock in proof while it is still available.
Many insurance adjusters assume lane splitting equals wrongdoing because it sounds unfamiliar to drivers who have never ridden. They may lean on general talking points instead of investigating the driver’s lane change, signal use, or distraction. We challenge those assumptions with facts, including traffic flow, visibility, and the driver’s duty to merge safely. Comparative fault California motorcycle accident rules can be used fairly, but insurers often try to inflate rider responsibility to reduce payouts. We respond with a clear narrative supported by evidence, not emotion. When a police report is incomplete or misleading, we address it with supporting documents and corrections when appropriate. This is how we keep the claim focused on what actually caused the crash.
A fair result requires more than proving fault because the claim must also show what the crash has cost you. We collect medical records, billing statements, and treatment plans, then connect them to a clear timeline. Lost wages and work limitations also matter, so we document time missed, job duties affected, and future earning concerns when injuries linger. We also account for property damage, including the motorcycle and safety gear, because those losses add up quickly. Non-economic damages require careful presentation as well, since insurers often downplay pain and disruption. Our approach is to build a complete, organized demand package that supports motorcycle accident compensation California claims with real documentation.
Insurance companies often call repeatedly, ask leading questions, and pressure people to settle before the full medical picture is clear. Once we represent you, we take over communications, organize the claim file, and keep the process moving. That reduces stress and helps prevent mistakes that insurers use to devalue a case. We also watch deadlines and paperwork requirements that can derail claims when someone is trying to heal and work at the same time. If the other driver’s insurer pushes for a recorded statement, we manage that request and protect your interests. When needed, we coordinate with other resources that support recovery and stability, including guidance available through Sacramento injury claim help. If you want to learn more about our approach and values, visit our firm.
Some insurers only pay fairly when they see a case is ready to be proven in court. We prepare claims with that reality in mind because it changes how the other side evaluates risk. That means organizing evidence, identifying liability arguments early, and documenting damages with the same care we would use in litigation. When settlement makes sense, we negotiate from a position of strength because the file is complete and supported. If the insurer refuses to be reasonable, we are prepared to take the next step and fight for a fair outcome. This approach also helps in lane splitting disputes because it replaces assumptions with proof. If you are ready to talk privately, reach us through our contact page.
Yes, lane splitting is legal on California roads, including freeways, as long as it is done with reasonable care. California lane splitting laws define the practice but do not create a separate freeway-only rule. Because freeways involve higher speeds and frequent lane changes near exits, the safety analysis often turns on traffic conditions and the speed difference between vehicles. Riders should stay predictable and avoid weaving, while drivers should signal early and check blind spots carefully. After a collision, insurers often focus on the freeway setting to imply higher risk, yet the legal question still comes back to what each person did. Evidence such as video, witness accounts, and damage angles usually provides the clearest answer.
No, lane splitting does not automatically make the rider at fault. Comparative fault California motorcycle accident rules allow responsibility to be shared based on what actually happened. If a driver changed lanes without signaling, failed to check blind spots, or drifted while distracted, those actions can still be the primary cause. Insurers may claim lane splitting itself proves negligence, but they must support fault with evidence. A rider can also recover compensation even if they share some responsibility, depending on the facts. The strongest claims are built with documentation that shows traffic flow, lane position, and the driver’s movement into the rider’s space. When we provide rider crash claim help, we focus on evidence that keeps the blame analysis fair.
Drivers should not try to block a motorcycle because sudden lane-line crowding and aggressive moves can create danger. Even if a driver feels frustrated in traffic, safety requires predictable driving and safe lane changes. Blocking behavior can increase the likelihood of a crash and may create liability if it contributes to a collision. The safer approach is to maintain lane position, signal properly, and avoid abrupt movements. Motorcycles can be present between lanes, so drivers should expect the possibility and check carefully before changing lanes. If a crash happens after a driver crowds or swerves toward a rider, witness statements and video can be important in showing what occurred.
Police reports can contain mistakes, especially when officers arrive after vehicles have moved or when witnesses offer conflicting summaries. A report may also include brief language like “lane splitting” without explaining traffic speed, lane positions, or a driver’s unsafe merge. If something is inaccurate, it helps to gather supporting evidence such as photos, video, and witness contact information. Medical records and a consistent timeline also help because they anchor the claim to objective facts. We regularly review reports for missing context and address errors with supporting documentation when possible. If a report is hurting your case, our Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyer team can step in and work to correct the narrative early.
It is common for the other driver’s insurer to call quickly and ask for a recorded statement. You can provide basic facts, yet you should be cautious because their goal is to reduce what they pay. Avoid guessing and keep statements short and factual, especially about speed and distance. If you are still being evaluated or starting treatment, it is also too early to say you are “fine.” Many people feel pressure to cooperate, but it is reasonable to pause and get advice before giving a recorded statement. Once we represent you, we handle these conversations and protect your interests. If you want help managing insurance contact, use our contact page to reach us directly.
Many lane splitting collisions involve a driver who changed lanes, merged, or stopped suddenly, which creates overlapping liability issues. The key is to preserve evidence and avoid letting the claim become a battle of opinions. If the driver argues the motorcycle was “going too fast,” evidence like video and damage angles often clarifies what is true. When the crash involves standard vehicle negligence issues, it can overlap with the same approach used in cases where people need help after a Sacramento crash. Our team focuses on building a clear timeline, documenting injuries, and presenting a complete demand. That approach keeps the discussion centered on responsibility and compensation rather than blame. For additional local guidance, you can also reference Sacramento injury claim help as a starting point while we take action on the case.
California lane splitting laws do not give insurance companies a free pass to blame the rider. Liability still comes down to choices, timing, and whether each person used reasonable care. When a driver merges without checking blind spots or signals late, lane splitting does not erase that duty. Because evidence can disappear quickly, early action can make a real difference in how fault is decided. Medical documentation matters just as much because it connects the crash to your injuries and supports fair compensation. If you are dealing with pushback, delays, or a low offer, you do not have to handle it alone. We step in, protect the facts, and pursue the outcome your recovery requires.
The Choyce Law Firm is led by Dionne E. Choyce, a former Alameda County prosecutor and trial attorney who has tried hundreds of jury trials and fights insurance companies with a courtroom mindset. We have recovered millions for injured clients and bring the same focus to motorcycle cases where lane splitting becomes an excuse for unfair blame. From our office at 1438 Del Paso Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95815, we serve clients across Sacramento County with one clear promise: no fee until we win. When you call, you get straight answers, a clear plan, and a team that treats you with respect. If you want to understand your options, start with our Sacramento motorcycle accident lawyer page or explore our firm to learn how we work. For immediate help, call (916) 306-0636 or reach us through our contact page.
If a lane splitting crash left you hurt, missing work, or facing aggressive insurance tactics, we are ready to help you move forward. We can review the facts, identify the strongest evidence, and explain how comparative fault may affect your claim. You can also find additional local resources and next steps through Sacramento injury claim help. The sooner you reach out, the easier it is to preserve video, locate witnesses, and keep the story accurate. Call (916) 306-0636 today for a free, confidential consultation. We listen, we act, and we fight for the full value of your case.